Bob Marli
PCAXE Member
- Učlanjen(a)
- 31.10.2010.
- Poruka
- 604
- Rezultat reagovanja
- 2
Moja konfiguracija
CPU & cooler:
Intel Core i5-760 4.0Ghz / Mega Shadow Deluxe
Motherboard:
Asus P7P55D-E Evo
RAM:
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2x8GB 1600MHz / OC 1800Mhz
VGA & cooler:
GeForce GTX770 MSI GAMING 2GB
Display:
Samsung SA550 / LG 55UB850V
HDD:
OCZ Vertex 2 60GB / Samsung 840 EVO 250GB / Samsung F4 2TB / WD Green WD30EZRX 3TB / WD Green WD30
Sound:
X-fi Xtreme Music / Logitech Z-5500
Case:
Corsair Graphite Series 600T Black
PSU:
Chieftec CTF750W
Optical drives:
Samsung DVD-RW
Mice & keyboard:
Logitech G500 / Logitech G110
Internet:
SBB 40/2.5 mbit
OS & Browser:
Windows 7
Other:
Sony Plastation 3 Slim 320GB , Samsung S5, Samusung S3, iPad 3, Nokia 6300
Ja znam da je bila prica da je snimano jedno sat vremena filma sa IMax kamerama, e sad koja je to rezolucija, ne znam.
Evo nesto o tome:
Evo nesto o tome:
IMAX Digital
Because 70mm film and projectors are costly and difficult to mass produce, IMAX debuted a digital projection system in 2008. It uses two projectors that can present either 2D or 3D content in DCI or IMAX digital format (which in itself is a superset of DCI). IMAX digital, until 2012, used 2K-resolution Christie projectors with Texas Instruments Digital Light Processing technology alongside parts of IMAX's proprietary technologies. The two 2K images are projected over each other, producing an image that is potentially brighter 2K digital cinema.
The digital installations have caused some controversy, as many theatres have branded their screens as IMAX after merely retrofitting standard auditoriums with IMAX digital projectors. The screen sizes in these auditoriums are much smaller than those in the purpose-built auditoriums of the original 15/70 IMAX format. These theatres charge the same premium pricing as the purpose-built IMAX theatres, resulting in consumer confusion. IMAX marketing makes no distinction between the new smaller digital installations and the original format.[18] Some high profile figures such as actor Aziz Ansari[19] and film critic Roger Ebert[20] have also actively voiced their concerns.
Another disadvantage is a lower resolution than normal IMAX film, estimated to be about 12,000 × 8,700 theoretical pixels or 6,120 × 4,500 actually discernible pixels (27 megapixels).[21] Some reviewers also note that the approach to using dual 2K projectors does not produce an image quality higher than a single 4K projector system, which are available for some non-IMAX theatres.[18][22] Although originally, IMAX considered using two Sony 4K projectors.[23]
On Feb 3rd, 2012, IMAX announced that it had selected Barco as the primary supplier of projectors for the next 7 years.[24] In late April 2012, IMAX began testing a new 4K laser-projection system, based on patents licensed from Eastman Kodak. Like the film and digital systems, it uses two projectors but it has been said to improve over the smaller digital screens by retaining the traditional IMAX aspect ratio and to allow films to be shown on screens 120 feet wide or more. The laser projector will be available to exhibitors in the fourth quarter of 2013.[25]
IMAX recently has been moving forward with digital projection with recent success with The Hunger Games and The Avengers and digital projection has aided in the company's worldwide growth, especially in Russia and China. Mainly because the system facilitates inexpensive distribution of IMAX features. The company has recently announced that they are re-renovating specially selected locations around the world to present both 70mm analog and digital presentations. To do so, IMAX has developed with another, currently unknown, business partner a rail system that allows the projectors to be moved in and out if there's either a full-frame film print available or a digital-only release. These theatres were prepared in time for the release of The Dark Knight Rises in July 2012.[26]