illidan
PCAXE Addicted
- Učlanjen(a)
- 01.04.2009.
- Poruka
- 6.841
- Rezultat reagovanja
- 3.288
Moja konfiguracija
CPU & cooler:
amd 5800x3d, ek nucleus cr240 dark
Motherboard:
asus proart b550
RAM:
g.skill trident z neo 32gb
VGA & cooler:
nvidia rtx 4070super founders edition
Display:
asus vg27aql1a
HDD:
samsung 980 pro 1tb, samsung 860 qvo 1tb
Sound:
ifi zen dac v2, presonus eris 3.5, akg k712 pro balanced
Case:
corsair 4000d white airflow, phanteks t30 fans
PSU:
be quiet! dark power 12 750w 80+ titanium
Mice & keyboard:
lamzu atlantis mini, kbd.fans tofu65 e-white
Internet:
optical cable
Last week, Intel sketched out its strategy in dealing with its client processor brand Core, and placing its different kinds of processors in series of markers (such as "i3", "i5", and "i7"), on the merit of performance and features they offer, and not necessarily a segregation based on core type and socket type. This raised a big debate in our forums, on who is really going to benefit from this kind of branding.
Chinese website INPAI.com.cn sourced information which explains what factors go into determining which brand marker a processor gets. The table elaborates on how different kinds of Intel processors (determined by core and socket types) cross different lines, with a few features toggled or enhanced. It is sure to throw up some surprises.
Intel may rebadge existing Wolfdale, Yorkfield, and Penryn Mobile chips into Core i3
As bizarre as it seems, it looks like existing Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad processors are bound for a new name tag, under Core i3. The processors will form Intel's value offerings, since they compare to the lower-end derivatives of the Nehalem architecture. At this point in time, we don't know if (and don't expect) higher-end Wolfdale and Yorkfield models to make it to this series, but rather the lower-end Core 2 Duo E7000, E8000, Core 2 Quad Q8000, Q9x00, etc. to do so, as they make the most market sense with Nehalem and Westmere derivatives higher up the order. The processors will continue to be driven by existing chipsets by Intel, which include members of Intel 3-series and 4-series.
Arrandale as Core i3, Clarkdale as Core i5
Intel thinks its desktop dual-core Westmere derivative Clarkdale is faster and more capable than its mobile cousin Arrandale. This could be because traditionally, mobile CPUs trade off clock-speeds for energy efficiency, and make up to an extant with large caches. The Clarksfield quad-core mobile chip will get the Core i7 marker. It will come in two distinct flavours, with L3 cache sizes of 6 MB and 8 MB.
Lynnfield in Core i5 and Core i7
This comes as no surprise since Intel's marketing heads had already made it clear that Lynnfield would span across two brand markers. The determining factors, seem to be HyperThreading technology, and perhaps clock speeds. The Core i7 Lynnfield chip has HyperThreading technology available as a feature, and may have higher clock-speeds. The first wave of Lynnfield chips that release in Q3 2009, will be only of the Core i5 kind, while the performance Core i7 ones will follow months later, in Q1 2010.
Say hello to Core i9
Intel's upcoming flagship client processor, codenamed Gulftown will get the higher Core i9 marker. This 6-core chip will have every performance enhancing feature in the book available, including a total thread count of 12, and a 50% increase in L3 cache over Bloomfield, at 12 MB. It will retain compatibility with the existing LGA-1366 socket, and X58 chipset, and will be available in Q1 2010.
izvor
Zamišljam scenario gde će prodavati i specijalno osakaćene ploče sa 1155 podnožjem u koje ne može da se stavi 1156 CPU, dok obrnuto može, nešto kao AM2+/AM3. Ili ipak nisu toliko blesavi? 
postenim radom nemoze 
:butcher::trust:
Nisu se oni smilovali pa 'nam' poklonili cooler sa pajpovima. Mislim da ce disipacija da bude zestoka.
