reb0rn
PCAXE Member
- Učlanjen(a)
- 21.08.2010.
- Poruka
- 442
- Rezultat reagovanja
- 5
Moja konfiguracija
CPU & cooler:
i5 4670
Motherboard:
Asus z87-A
RAM:
2x 8GB Kingston 2133Mhz
VGA & cooler:
Sapphire R290x Tri-X
Display:
Samsung 32inc+ViewSonic VA2216w
HDD:
Samsung 256MB SSD + 1TB Samsung F2
Sound:
integrated
Case:
Tower trooper
PSU:
Seasonic 750W KM3
Optical drives:
Nec DVD
Internet:
SBB
OS & Browser:
win8.1 x64
taj "review" kao... ne pije vodu pun je nelogicnosti kao na primer:
Finally, even the cpu-intensive game Far Cry 2. We run a loop on a full-HD with all settings at maximum and direct X 10 on. The AMD FX-8150 renders an average of 111 fps and a minimum of 23 fps. I7 126 fps compared to 965 puts it, and a minimum of 75.2 fps. Here you see a bit more powerful Intel cores than AMD.
- neverovatno razlika u min fps-u
takodje testiraju igre na i7 - Nehalem-u, pa cak krive dobitak i7 zasto sto ima 6Gb rama???
Finally, even the cpu-intensive game Far Cry 2. We run a loop on a full-HD with all settings at maximum and direct X 10 on. The AMD FX-8150 renders an average of 111 fps and a minimum of 23 fps. I7 126 fps compared to 965 puts it, and a minimum of 75.2 fps. Here you see a bit more powerful Intel cores than AMD.
- neverovatno razlika u min fps-u
takodje testiraju igre na i7 - Nehalem-u, pa cak krive dobitak i7 zasto sto ima 6Gb rama???