Nope Mislim da sam proverio sve te "about" strane. Baš je čudno & besmisleno da nisu negde ostavili jasno vidljivu brojčanu oznaku (pod)verzije
Evo ovde neke vrste objašnjenja gde nestade ovo označavanje:
http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/08/firefox-6-ships-but-we-shouldnt-really-pay-attention.ars
Tu piše i ovo, što sam i ja više puta rekao:
"the entire problem could have been avoided if Mozilla had simply switched to a date-like version number. This would both end one of the enterprise gripes—that major version number bumps incur extra testing—and the About box could then say something equivalent to, "this version of Firefox was created on 2011-08-11. It is up-to-date," which would both tell users how stale their version was (if at all), and serve as a version identifier of sorts."
*****
Inače, postoji i FF6 na srpskom:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Evo ovde neke vrste objašnjenja gde nestade ovo označavanje:
http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/08/firefox-6-ships-but-we-shouldnt-really-pay-attention.ars
Tu piše i ovo, što sam i ja više puta rekao:
"the entire problem could have been avoided if Mozilla had simply switched to a date-like version number. This would both end one of the enterprise gripes—that major version number bumps incur extra testing—and the About box could then say something equivalent to, "this version of Firefox was created on 2011-08-11. It is up-to-date," which would both tell users how stale their version was (if at all), and serve as a version identifier of sorts."
*****
Inače, postoji i FF6 na srpskom:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Poslednja izmena: