micri
Betmen
- Učlanjen(a)
- 01.04.2009.
- Poruka
- 3.535
- Rezultat reagovanja
- 181
Moja konfiguracija
PC / Laptop Name:
Rupa bez dna
CPU & cooler:
AMD 9800X3D/Asus ROG Ryujin III 360
Motherboard:
Asus TUF B850M-Plus Wifi
RAM:
G.SKILL 32GB Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5 6000MHz CL28
VGA & cooler:
Asus ROG Strix RTX3080
Display:
Alienware AW3423DWF/Hisense 65u8gq
HDD:
Seagate Firecuda 520 1tb/Seagate Firecuda 520 1tb/WD 3TB RED/WD 2TB Black
Sound:
Samsung Q800c/Razer Blackshark v2 Pro/JBL Flip 5
Case:
LIAN LI PC-O11D Mini TG black/Phantesk D30 RGB x7
PSU:
CORSAIR SF Series SF750 Platinum 750W
Mice & keyboard:
Monsgeek M1V3/Zuoya GMK26/Razer Naga 2014/Razer Deathadder v3 Pro
Internet:
Optika 600/600
OS & Browser:
W10
Other:
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 256GB/Logitech F710/Sony Playstation 5 Disc/BambuLab P1S+AMS
PowerColor was the first to inform the world that Radeon 4730 is coming and as the name implies, many expected a 40nm RV740 rather than RV770LE 55nm.
ATI used Nvidia renaming strategy (shame on you) as this is nothing more than Radeon 4830 renamed to justifiy its lower price. This is not a simple SKU rename as Radeon 4730 name implies that the card is different since it has 700MHz clock versus 575MHz on 4830, and 128 bit memory interface powered with 3600MHz GDDR5 memory.
The specs give us the impression that Radeon HD 4730 has every chance to end up faster than Radeon HD 4830. Nvidia simply renames the same chip and uses the same specs and the same name, which is somehow worse, but unfortunately increases its sales. So much about market awareness.
Since both have 640 shader processors the slower number one might end up faster. We will have to wait and see but one thing is certain, Radeon HD 4730 is not 40nm based as ATI obviously doesn’t have enough 40nm chips at its disposal.
Source